In today’s complex real estate and legal landscape, couples are increasingly making critical decisions about homeownership, refinancing, and property titles, often without fully understanding the legal consequences.
This article will help you uncover the hidden risks of title-only loans, explore landmark California court cases, and provide practical steps to protect both spouses’ interests. Whether you’re considering refinancing, purchasing a home, or navigating divorce, this guide is essential reading.
This economy has seen courts dealing more frequently with the question of which spouse receives the house or sale proceeds or bears the loss of equity in a divorce. In the lending frenzy of the last few years, couples eager to get low interest rates accepted recommendations of brokers who suggested that they could get the best loan by listing only one spouse on the loan and title.
While this strategy may seem like a clever way to secure a lower rate, it carries hidden legal risks that can lead to property loss, disputes, and financial hardship during divorce.
The 2005 decision in In re the Marriage of Mathews set forth the proposition that a spouse who takes his or her name off the title of the family home to get a better interest rate may lose ownership rights if the spouse whose name remains on the title can show they exercised no undue influence in the title change.
Key Takeaways from Mathews:
On December 16, 2008, California’s appellate court published In re the Marriage of Brooks and Robinson. In this case:
This decision reinforces that title dictates ownership, absent a clear agreement or proof of community property intent.
California Family Code 760: The Community Property Presumption
All property acquired during marriage is presumed to be community property, unless proven otherwise.
California Family Code 852: Transmutation Requirements
To change property from community to separate (or vice versa), spouses must have a transmutation agreement that:
To challenge title-only ownership:
Doctrine of Commingling
When separate and community funds are mixed, ownership can become disputed.
Tracing Principle
Courts may allow reimbursement if a spouse can trace separate property funds used for the home purchase.
In re Marriage of Marsden
Even if one spouse provides all the funds, courts may consider the title holder as the owner unless evidence shows otherwise.
In re Marriage of Benson
A written agreement (or lack thereof) can determine ownership, verbal agreements often cannot override title.
Types of Title Instruments
Yes! A transmutation agreement is a written contract that changes property ownership. It’s essential when removing a spouse from the title to clarify intent and protect both parties.
Only if the titled spouse agrees. Otherwise, you’ll need to pursue legal action, especially during divorce proceedings.
If the property is solely in their name, they can legally sell it without informing you. This is why a co-ownership agreement is crucial.
Yes. Without a clear transmutation agreement, the property may legally become the separate property of the titled spouse.
Through tracing: providing bank records, checks, or documents showing the source of funds. Courts may allow reimbursement under Family Code 2640.
This is yet another reminder that couples should be careful when purchasing or refinancing property. If not, that bargain interest rate now could be very costly down the road.
At Divorce Digest, we’re here to help you navigate the complexities of marital property law, title issues, and divorce strategies. Whether you’re facing a divorce or simply want to protect your home, our experts provide the knowledge, tools, and legal insights you need to make informed decisions.
Contact us today to schedule a consultation and safeguard your rights!