Attorney’s fees may be sought under a variety of reasons in any action under the Family Law Act. This article discusses some options for fees when seeking to enforce your judgment of dissolution.
The easiest way to seek fees is when you are a non-offending party (you have complied with the judgment) and seeking the other party to perform what was expected of them by the terms of the judgment. Many times, a judgment will contain a provision relating to attorney’s fees for enforcement and might indicate:
“In the event that either party brings any action or proceeding to enforce any provision contained in this judgment, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive from the other such reasonable attorney’s fees and other reasonably necessary costs incident thereto as will be fixed by the court, regardless of the need and or ability of the parties to pay same.”
A provision such as this is commonly referred to as a “prevailing party” clause and is enforced in the same manner as any contract that includes an attorney’s fee provision.
A “prevailing party” clause is not something you would expect to find in a judgment after trial, and arises only in negotiated agreements in a divorce. Sometimes, a lower earner or the spouse with less economic strength may object to such a provision, as it could expose them to fees that they would not otherwise incur.
Nonetheless, when included, the clause serves as a contractual commitment between spouses, stipulating that the losing party in enforcement litigation must cover the winner’s legal expenses. This can dramatically shift strategy during settlement negotiations, as spouses weigh the risk of being held liable for both their own lawyer’s fees and those of their ex-spouse.
Even in instances where there is no prevailing party clause, an award of fees may be mandated by statute, such as in actions to enforce support orders or breaches of the judgment that constitute a breach of fiduciary duty or bad faith conduct.
Whenever an action needs to be brought to enforce a judgment, consideration should be given to recovering the fees and costs incurred by the offending party’s non-compliance. Likewise, a party that is not following the terms of a judgment should expect the court not only to enforce the order but further order the payment of attorney’s fees and costs incurred by the non-offending party.
California family law provides specific statutory authority for attorneys’ fees in enforcement actions:
These laws establish that attorneys’ fees may be awarded not just to punish misconduct, but to promote fairness and equal access to justice.
When courts award attorneys’ fees, they often consider:
The California Supreme Court has recognized, in cases such as Marriage of Sullivan, that trial courts have broad discretion in awarding fees, striking a balance between fairness and necessity.
Attorney’s fees may be awarded in many post-divorce enforcement scenarios:
To recover attorney’s fees in enforcement actions, a spouse typically follows these steps:
The timeline can vary but often includes a filing period, service on the other party, and a scheduled hearing date within several weeks.
A spouse who refuses to comply with divorce judgments not only risks enforcement but also the additional burden of paying the other party’s attorney’s fees. Courts may:
According to Judicial Council data, contempt filings and enforcement actions remain one of the most common post-divorce motions in California family courts, highlighting the seriousness with which judges view compliance.
Yes. Courts routinely order fee-shifting in child support enforcement cases under Family Code §§3557 and 2030.
You may still be entitled to attorney’s fees under California Family Code §§2030, 2032, or 271, depending on financial need, bad faith conduct, or litigation tactics.
They apply the lodestar method, reviewing hours worked, billing rates, and complexity, while considering income disparity and conduct.
Yes. If you fail to comply with court orders or engage in litigation misconduct, the court can order you to pay your ex’s attorney’s fees.
Yes. If you seek or oppose modifications of child support, spousal support, or custody, the court may allocate attorney’s fees to ensure both sides have equal representation.
No. Courts generally do not award fees to self-represented parties, as there are no attorney costs to shift.
Yes. In many enforcement cases, the court may add attorney’s fees to arrears, effectively increasing the balance owed.
Navigating post-divorce enforcement and attorney’s fees requires experience, knowledge of California’s family code, and an understanding of local court procedures. The attorneys at Reape Rickett have decades of experience handling fee motions, support enforcement, property division disputes, and contempt proceedings.
If you are facing challenges enforcing a judgment or worried about attorney’s fee exposure, contact Reape Rickett today for a confidential consultation and ensure your rights are protected.
