Reprinted and expanded from the Bar Brief, Newsletter of The Beverly Hills Bar Association, January/February 2012 Issue. Updated to reflect procedural, legal, and practical considerations for California custody cases.
In January 2012, the next phase of the Elkins Legislation took effect, changing the way California courts handle child custody and visitation disputes. The legislation required the Judicial Council of California to establish procedures for examining child witnesses and to develop alternatives to direct testimony from children.
The law sought to balance two priorities: ensuring children’s voices are considered in decisions that affect their lives, while protecting them from the stress of adversarial testimony in open court.
Research shows that children often want to be heard in matters affecting them and prefer to share their input voluntarily. Many express that they would rather communicate directly with family members than with professionals. (Cashmore & Parkinson, 2008; Gallop et al., 2000; Kelly, 2002, 2007; Smith et al., 2003; Smart, 2002; Taylor, 2006).
The Elkins reforms highlighted two cost-effective alternatives to direct testimony:
These methods provide courts with insight into a child’s perspective without requiring a full 730 evaluation, which is broader, more expensive, and more time-consuming.
A Brief Assessment/Solution Focused Evaluation (BA/SFE) is a targeted evaluation that examines a specific issue, rather than a child’s overall family environment.
BA/SFEs are not suited for every dispute. They should generally be avoided in cases involving:
In short, BA/SFEs provide a snapshot of family dynamics helpful for limited questions, but not comprehensive enough for complex disputes.
A child interview is another approach courts use to understand children’s perspectives. It is generally less costly than a BA/SFE but offers limited information.
This makes child interviews a direct but narrow tool, a snapshot of the child’s voice, not the family system.
A 730 evaluation is a comprehensive custody evaluation under California Evidence Code Section 730. It reviews family functioning, parental capacity, and psychological concerns.
Courts decide which method is appropriate based on the complexity of the case and the child’s best interests.
Parents involved in custody disputes should understand:
Under Family Code Section 3042, courts must consider the wishes of children age 14 or older, though younger children may be heard if appropriate.
Licensed custody evaluators, therapists, or family court services professionals typically conduct these assessments.
Yes, participation must be voluntary. Courts will not compel a child to testify against their will.
Interviews are generally confidential, but summaries or testimony may be provided to the court and shared with both parents.
Parents can challenge findings through testimony, cross-examination, or by requesting a broader evaluation, such as a 730 evaluation.
Courts may favor BA/SFE in domestic violence cases to quickly assess safety issues, but serious allegations may require a 730 evaluation.
Custody disputes require knowledge, strategy, and an understanding of California’s evolving custody laws. Whether your case involves a BA/SFE, child interview, or 730 evaluation, guidance from an experienced attorney is essential.
At Reape Rickett, we help parents navigate complex custody disputes with a child-focused approach. Our attorneys have the experience to advise on evaluations, prepare you for the process, and protect your rights while ensuring your child’s best interests remain at the forefront.
Contact Reape Rickett today to schedule a confidential consultation.