There is a presumption in California law that a marriage of ten years is deemed to be a long-term marriage. In some instances, marriages of shorter duration have also been found to qualify as marriages of long duration.
The significance of this finding is most evident in Family Code, Section 4336, which provides:
“Except on written agreement of the parties to the contrary or a court order terminating spousal support, the court retains jurisdiction indefinitely in a proceeding for dissolution of marriage or for legal separation of the parties where the marriage is of long duration.”
This statutory rule makes the classification of a marriage as “long-term” extremely important for divorcing spouses in California. A designation of long-term marriage opens the possibility of extended or even indefinite jurisdiction by the court over spousal support orders.
In California family law, the length of the marriage directly impacts the scope and duration of spousal support.
This distinction does not mean lifetime alimony is guaranteed. Rather, it ensures that the court retains the authority to respond to the evolving financial circumstances of either spouse.
Let us say that the Judgment of Dissolution states that the Husband would pay $2,000 per month for a period of sixty months for spousal support and that the support would “terminate forever and no court shall have any jurisdiction to extend this award of spousal support either as to the amount or duration after said date.”
Before the expiration of this sixty-month term, Wife applied to extend spousal support beyond the sixty months. The wife argued that the previously entered agreement implicitly authorized the court to continue jurisdiction to modify support, so long as the request was made before the end of the sixty months.
As might be expected, the trial court rejected Wife’s argument, stating that the agreement was explicit enough in that it did not have jurisdiction to continue the payments.
Wife appealed. The Court of Appeal reversed the trial court and accepted the Wife’s argument. The Court stated that parties can agree that a support order shall not be subject to court modification, but that explicit written language is required to terminate jurisdiction to modify.
In light of a strong public policy in favor of retention of jurisdiction over the issue of spousal support, particularly in long marriages, any ambiguity as to a provision attempting to make an order non-modifiable will be construed in favor of retaining jurisdiction.
This appellate decision underscores three key principles:
1. Public Policy Favoring Jurisdiction
California’s legal system emphasizes the importance of maintaining jurisdiction over spousal support in long-term marriages. This ensures fairness when financial conditions change over time.
2. Requirement for Explicit Waiver
If divorcing spouses wish to prevent modification of spousal support, the language in their agreement must be unmistakably clear. General statements or vague limitations are not enough.
3. Ambiguity Resolved in Favor of Jurisdiction
Courts will interpret any unclear provisions in favor of retaining authority, ensuring that a spouse is not unfairly deprived of support due to ambiguous wording.
Although the ten-year rule is widely recognized, courts are not bound by it exclusively. Judges may classify a marriage of fewer than ten years as long-term when circumstances justify it. Factors that may influence this determination include:
This flexibility means that a nine-year marriage in which one spouse is financially dependent may still be considered long-term, while a twelve-year marriage between financially independent spouses may not always receive the same consideration.
Even where the court retains jurisdiction, spousal support does not last forever under all circumstances. Some conditions that typically terminate support include:
It is also important to distinguish between temporary spousal support (ordered during the divorce process) and permanent or post-judgment spousal support (ordered once the divorce is finalized).
This distinction is critical because permanent support orders are where the question of jurisdiction and long-term marriage has the greatest impact.
For divorcing couples, these principles highlight the importance of careful planning and clear legal drafting.
A marriage lasting ten years or more is generally presumed to be a long-term marriage. However, shorter marriages may also qualify based on circumstances such as financial dependency, caregiving roles, or health issues.
No. It means the court retains jurisdiction indefinitely. Spousal support may continue as long as circumstances warrant, but it can be modified or terminated under certain conditions.
Yes. Unless the judgment specifically and explicitly states that the support is non-modifiable, the court may adjust spousal support if circumstances change.
In most cases, spousal support ends upon remarriage of the supported spouse unless the divorce judgment clearly states otherwise.
Yes, in some cases. If one spouse was financially dependent or left a career to support the marriage, a court may still classify it as long-term even if it was under ten years.
When the paying spouse retires, courts may reevaluate the support order. The reduction in income may justify lowering or terminating the payments, but the court examines the full financial situation of both spouses.
Temporary support is typically ordered during divorce proceedings to provide financial stability, whereas permanent support is typically ordered after the divorce and may last for a significantly longer period, depending on the circumstances and the length of the marriage.
Spousal support and the classification of a marriage as long-term can have lasting financial consequences. The laws surrounding Family Code Sections 4336 and 4320, as well as the interpretation of agreements and the conditions under which support can be modified or terminated, are complex and fact-specific.
The experienced family law attorneys at Reape Rickett understand these complexities and can help you navigate the legal system with confidence. Whether you are negotiating spousal support, seeking to modify an existing order, or defending against a modification request, professional guidance is essential.
Visit Reape Rickett to schedule a consultation and gain clarity on your rights and obligations under California law.
